Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

W.P.No.12209 Of 2 vs The Commissioner Of Police

Madras High Court|31 January, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition for the relief stated above.
2. According to the petitioner, at the instance of fourth respondent, the second respondent has interfered with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the fourth respondent in respect of the aforementioned property. Hence, the present Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner.
3. The learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that a complaint was given by the fourth respondent against the petitioner and the same has been enquired and closed for the reason that it was a case involving civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the fourth respondent before the Civil Court and the respondents will not interfere with the civil dispute pending before the Court .
4. In view of the submission made by the learned Special Government Pleader that the respondents will not interfere with the civil dispute pending between the parties before the Court, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, if any complaint is received by the second respondent, the same shall be acted upon in accordance with law by the second respondent. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

W.P.No.12209 Of 2 vs The Commissioner Of Police

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
31 January, 2017