Petitioner claims re-instatement and payment of subsistence allowance.
2. For this purpose, he has submitted Ext.P29 representation before the 1 st respondent. Along with I.A. No.9038/2018, petitioner has produced Ext.P30 representation stated to have been submitted before the Additional Chief Secretary to Government.
3. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner would be satisfied with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P30 representation.
4. I heard the learned counsel for the 1 st respondent as well as the learned State Attorney, W.P.(C).No.15103 of 2018 2 also.
In view of the limited relief sought, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P30 representation after affording an opportunity of hearing to petitioner, and pass orders on it, in accordance with law, within a period of 'two months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Sd/-
P.V.ASHA, JUDGE.
ww