Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Wali Mohammad vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 24
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20783 of 2018 Applicant :- Wali Mohammad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Waseem Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is on bail in the solitary case shown against him in the gang chart. The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. There is no reliable evidence against him. It is further submitted that in case the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial. It is further submitted that no bail cancellation application has been moved till today regarding the cases shown in the gang chart.
On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, provision for initiation of cases and release of the accused in U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Wali Mohammad involved in Case Crime No. 488 of 2017 under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Cantt., District - Bareilly be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this Court.
Order Date :- 31.5.2018 ss
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Wali Mohammad vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2018
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Mohammad Waseem