Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Wakeel vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 22
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11456 of 2018 Applicant :- Wakeel Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Jagdish Prasad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
According to prosecution case, F.I.R. was lodged by the informant against three accused persons, namely, Wakeel, Taimur and Sayara alleging that on 25.4.2017 they entered the house of complainant and assaulted the daughter of Intjar Ahmad and shot fire at complainant and her mother but they escaped themselves.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that there is no evidence to connect the applicant with the present matter. Entire prosecution story is false and fabricated. Applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of sexual harassment against the applicant. No firearm injury was found on the body of injured. It is a case of no injury. Offence under Section 307 IPC is not made out against the applicant. There is no independent witness. He is languishing in jail since 25.4.2017 (more than eleven months) having no previous criminal history and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant and admitted that applicant has no previous criminal history.
Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence the bail application is hereby allowed.
Let the applicant Wakeel involved in the Case Crime No. 369 of 2017, under Sections 452, 307, 386, 354, 354-C, 509 IPC, P.S. Kairana, District Shamli be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 29.3.2018 A. Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Wakeel vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 March, 2018
Judges
  • Aniruddha Singh
Advocates
  • Jagdish Prasad Mishra