Petitioners seek quash of proceedings in Cr.No.293 of 2011 on the file of the second respondent registered for offences under Section 405, 463 & 420 IPC. C.T.SELVAM, J., kmi
2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned counsel for first respondent and learned Government Advocate for second respondent.
3. Recording the submission of learned Government Advocate (criminal side) that investigation has been completed and the matter stands closed as 'mistake of fact', this petition is closed. Taking into consideration the submission of learned counsel for second respondent/de facto complainant that R.C.S. notice has not been served on the second respondent and finding that according to the first respondent, notice was served by way of affixture, this Court permits the first respondent to prefer a protest petition before the concerned Magistrate within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order.
16.03.2017 Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no kmi To
1. The Inspector of Police, Arani Town Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.3557 of 2012