Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents, apart from perusing the record. Since the issue lies in a narrow compass, this Court proposes to dispose of the writ petition at the admission stage itself. 2. Briefly stated, the petitioner, a High School Assistant (Hindi), was initially appointed on 01.12.2006 in the school under the Management of the 4th respondent. Later, in course of time, the petitioner's appointment came to be approved by the authorities only from 01.06.2011, in view of the fact that the petitioner was appointed when the ban imposed by the Government against recruitment had been in force. As the record reveals, the 4th respondent Manager did not comply with the condition of executing a bond as required under the Government Order dated 10.12.2014 to have any retrospectivity to the appointment made during the subsistence of the ban.
W.P.(C) No.25264 of 2014
2
3. While the 3rd respondent issued staff fixation order for the academic year 2014-15 in Ext.P4, the petitioner was transferred to Teachers' Bank treating as if she were an excess teacher. Assailing Ext.P4, the petitioner filed a statutory revision before the 2nd respondent in Ext.P6. The grievance of the petitioner is that so far the revision has not been disposed of. It is further brought to the notice of this Court that with regard to the denial of approval of appointment, the petitioner already preferred Ext.P3 revision before the 1st respondent. It appears that both the revisions have not been so far disposed of. Complaining of inaction on the part of the revisional authorities, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.
4. The learned Government Pleader has submitted that the revisional authorities would be making every effort to ensure speedy disposal of these revisions and that it may not be necessary for this Court at this juncture to address the issues raised by the petitioner on merits.
5. In the facts and circumstances, having regard to the respective submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, this Court, without W.P.(C) No.25264 of 2014
3
expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, disposes of the writ petition with a direction to the 1st and 2nd respondents to dispose of Exts.P3 and P6 revisions respectively in accordance with law and pass appropriate order thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE
sj