Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

The Manager vs V.Kalimuthu ..First

Madras High Court|27 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The claimant, who suffered injuries in the motor accident that occurred on 08.11.2007, sought for compensation of Rs.5 lakhs for the injuries suffered by him.
2.The appellant/Insurance Company resisted the claim petition on the ground that three persons travelled in a two-wheeler and they were also drunk. The claimant, who drove the vehicle did not have a valid driving licence. Therefore, according to the Insurance Company, certain amount of contributory negligence should have been attributed to the claimant also.
3.The Tribunal, upon consideration of the oral and documentary evidence, came to the conclusion that the accident had occurred due to the negligence of the driver of the offending vehicle i.e.,the vehicle belonging to the second respondent. The Tribunal also took note of the non- examination of the second respondent, who was driving the offending vehicle, by the Insurance Company.
4.On the quantum, the Tribunal assessed the disability at 50% and granted a sum of Rs.1,000/- per percentage of disability and granted a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards partial permanent disability, Rs.20,000/- towards pain and suffering, Rs.4,610/- towards medical expenses, Rs.5,000/- towards transportation, Rs.5,000/- for extra nourishment and Rs.5,000/- towards loss of income and in all, granted a sum of Rs.89,610/- as compensation.
5.The learned counsel for the appellant would contend that certain amount should be attributed towards contributory negligence of the injured claimant, because three persons travelled in a Motor Cycle.
6.Considering the fact that the Tribunal has only granted Rs.1,000/- per percentage of disability, even if certain amount of contributory negligence is attributed to the injured claimant, the same may not make any difference as the amount awarded towards disability requires enhancement. The award as the whole is reasonable. Hence I do not see any reason to interfere with the award of the Tribunal and thus, the appeal fails.
7.Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs.
To
1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate), Karur.
2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. .
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

The Manager vs V.Kalimuthu ..First

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
27 June, 2017