When this revision petition was posted on 10.03.2017, there was no representation for the revision petitioner. Hence, the revision petition was directed to be listed on 21.03.2017. Even on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner. Hence, it was directed to be posted today under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the revision petitioner.
2. Thus, the revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
22.03.2017 dn Index:yes/no Internet:yes To The Additional District & Session Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Coimbatore.
CRP(PD) No.3545 of 2013
http://www.judis.nic.in