Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

The Managing Director vs Sudhakar

Madras High Court|05 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant/Transport Corporation against the Judgment and Decree made in M.C.O.P.No.1359 of 2013, dated 31.10.2014, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Special Subordinate Court, Thanjavur.
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows: It is a case of injury, which caused in the accident took place on 20.07.2011 at about 10.00p.m.. When the injured was travelling from Thanjavur old bus stand to Vannarapettai, in a bus belonging to the appellant /State Transport Corporation bearing Registration No.TN-01-N-3725, the bus was driver by its driver in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against a house. Due to the said accident, the injured claimant sustained grievous injuries, for which, he filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.1359 of 2013, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum Special Subordinate Court, Thanjavur, claiming a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- as compensation.
3. Before the Tribunal, on the side of the claimant, nine witnesses viz., P.W.1 to P.W.9 were examined and 11 documents viz., Exs.P.1 to P.11 were marked and on the side of the respondent, neither any witness was examined nor any document was marked.
4.The Tribunal, after considering the pleadings, oral and documentary evidence and arguments of the counsel appearing on either side and also appreciating the evidence on record, held that the accident occurred only, due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the offending vehicle and directed the appellant/Transport Corporation to pay a sum of Rs.3,93,000/-, as compensation.
5. Against which, the appellant/Transport Corporation has filed the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal only with regard to quantum of compensation.
6. The only contention raised by the learned Counsel for the appellant/Transport Corporation is that the amounts awarded by the Tribunal towards face disfigurement and loss of amenities are on higher side. Hence, he seeks interference of this Court io the award passed by the Tribunal.
7. The learned counsel for the respondent would submit that based on the available oral and documentary evidences, the Tribunal has rightly come to the conclusion and arrived at correct compensation under various heads.
8. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Counsel for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.
9. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed only questioning the quantum of compensation. This Court feels that the amount awarded by the Tribunal under head of face disfigurement to a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- is reasonable, considering the nature of injuries sustained by him during the accident and the disfigurement made in his face due to the accident. The amount awarded by the Tribunal towards loss of amenities to a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-, which this Court feels that it is on higher side, hence, it is inclined to reduce the same to Rs.50,000/-. Considering the pain and sufferings undergone by the injured claimant due to the injuries sustained by him, this Court feels that the amount awarded by the Tribunal under this head is very meagre, hence, this Court is inclined to increase the same to a sum of Rs.50,000/-. The amounts awarded under other heads shall stand unaltered.
10. In view of the above, this Court modifies the award of the Tribunal by reducing the compensation as under: S.No Description Amount awarded by the Tribunal Rs.
Amount awarded by this Court Rs.
Award confirmed or enhanced or granted 1 For permanent disability 1,14,000 1,14,000 confirmed 2 For attendant charges 800 800 confirmed 3 For face disfigurement 1,00,000 1,00,000 confirmed 4 For loss of amenities 1,00,000 50,000 reduced 5 For future medical expenses 10,000 10,000 confirmed 6 For pain and sufferings 30,000 50,000 enhanced 7 For loss of income during the treatment period 18,000 18,000 confirmed 8 For transportation charges 10,000 10,000 confirmed 9 For extra nourishment 10,200 10,200 confirmed Total 3,93,000 3,63,000 By reducing a sum of Rs.30,000
11. In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed by reducing the award of compensation from Rs.3,93,000/- to Rs.3,63,000/-, dated 31.10.2014, passed in M.C.O.P.No.1359 of 2013, by the Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Subordinate Court, Thanjavur. The appellant/State Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the entire award amount with accrued interests and costs, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if not already deposited and on such deposit being made, the claimant is permitted to withdraw the entire award amount, with accrued interests and costs without filing any formal petition before the Tribunal. No Costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
To,
1. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/ Special Subordinate Court, Thanjavur.
2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

The Managing Director vs Sudhakar

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
05 September, 2017