Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

The Managing Director vs The Deputy Collector/District ...

Madras High Court|05 April, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner in the writ petition is a Hotel and they have challenged a demand issued by the respondent for payment of sales tax based upon an amendment, which was made to the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act with retrospective effect from 01.04.2013.
2.In the Principal Bench, the South India Hotels and Restaurants Association had filed writ petition in W.P.No.995 of 2014, seeking for a declaration to declare Section 1(2)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax (5th Amendment) Act, 2013, insofar as it relates to the members of the said Association is concerned as arbitrary, unjust, illegal, unconstitutional and unenforceable in law. When the case came up before the Division Bench, the counsel for the Revenue submitted that the retrospective demands stands waived in view of the Notification issued by the Government dated 21.04.2015. Recording the same, the said writ petition was disposed of.
3.The learned counsel for the respondent TASMAC represented that the petitioner has challenged only the demand and has not sought for any writ of declaration in this petition.
4.However, the demand is on account of the retrospective operation of the statutory provision pursuant to the 5th Amendment Act, 2013. In the light of the new notification of the Government dated 21.04.2015, the demand made on the petitioner is unsustainable.
5.Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
To:
The Deputy Collector/District Manager, TASMAC Ltd., Madurai North Madurai..
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

The Managing Director vs The Deputy Collector/District ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
05 April, 2017