Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Kerala
  4. /
  5. 1998
  6. /
  7. January

V.P.Hamsa vs Mananthavady Municipality

High Court Of Kerala|17 July, 1998

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner is aggrieved with Ext.P2 demolition notice issued by the 1st respondent, to which Ext.P3 objection was filed. The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P3 objection has not been considered till date by the 1st respondent.
2. Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P3 objection and pass orders, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing. The demolition threatened as per Ext.P2 notice shall be kept in abeyance till the orders are passed and if the orders are prejudicial to the petitioner, no coercive proceedings shall be taken to carryout the demolition W.P.(C) No. 32834/2016 -2- unless the 30 days' period for filing an appeal before the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institution is over.
The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 1st respondent.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 13/10/16
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

V.P.Hamsa vs Mananthavady Municipality

Court

High Court Of Kerala

JudgmentDate
17 July, 1998