The petitioner was settled a timing as per Ext.P2 the petitioner contends that he has grievances with such settlement of timings and has filed a representation as per Ext.P4, which he seeks to be considered.
2. It is trite that when timings have been settled by the authority after issuing notice to the rival operators, there can be no revision merely on the ground that the petitioner is visited with hardship. The timing is also seen settled as on 30.01.2014. The petitioner will have to take the alternate remedy available to him to challenge Ext.P2 before the Tribunal, if so advised.
The Writ petition is closed, leaving open the remedy to approach the appellate authority.
Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj