Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

V.Muthubalan vs The Director Of Government ...

Madras High Court|15 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking writ of mandamus directing the respondent to alter his date of birth in all his testimonials inclusive of Secondary School Leaving Certificates as 10.10.1996 instead of 31.04.1996, reflected in the Educational Certificates.
2. According to the petitioner, he was born on 10.10.1996 as incorporated by the birth certificate issued by Mayiladuthurai Municipality dated 07.05.2014 whereas the school records reflect his date of birth as 31.04.1996.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that April contains only 30 days and hence, there is no date as 31.04.1996. Even though Rule 5 of the Secondary School Leaving Certificate Rules speaks about the prohibition with regard to correction of school certificate after passing SSLC examinations, it is a rare case where the date of birth itself has been wrongly shown as a date which is not in existence, namely 31st April. If 31.04.1996 cannot to be considered, then the actual date of birth as reflected in the birth certificate issued by the Municipality namely 10.10.1996 alone has to be considered. Moreover, in the transfer certificate issued by the School, the Head Master of the School had already made corrections as to the date of birth, as early as on 03.02.2015 itself. Therefore, consequently, the respondents are directed to make correction of the date of birth of the petitioner as 10.10.1996 instead of 31.04.1996 and issue fresh certificates to the petitioner.
4. It is made very clear that this order is passed as an exceptional case because the date of birth which is shown in the certificate is the date which is not in existence, viz. 31.04.1996. Therefore, this order cannot be a precedent in any circumstances. Moreover, Rule 5 of the Secondary School Leaving Certificate Rules are binding upon the authorities and any correction in the school certificates have to be made before passing the SSLC examination and it is not possible to do any correction after passing the SSLC examination.
5. In the result, the writ petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
15.03.2017 Speaking / Non-speaking Order Index: Yes/No rgr N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.
rgr To
1. The Director of Government Examinations Department of Government Examinations E.V.K.Sampath Maligai, Chennai 6 2 The Chief Educational Officer Office of the Chief Education Officer Mayiladuthurai, Nagapattinam.
W.P No.28590 of 2016 15.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

V.Muthubalan vs The Director Of Government ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
15 March, 2017