Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Vivek Yadav @ Pratap Singh Yadav vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 16381 of 2021 Applicant :- Vivek Yadav @ Pratap Singh Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Singh,Ratish Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
Applicant- Vivek Yadav @ Pratap Singh Yadav seeks anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 1533 of 2019, under Sections 379, 411 IPC, P.S.Baradari, District- Bareilly.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press this anticipatory bail application and the applicant is ready to surrender and apply for regular bail.
In view of the statement made, in case, the applicant appears/surrenders before the court below and applies for regular bail in the aforesaid case, the same be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law.
With the above directions, the anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 30.9.2021 R
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vivek Yadav @ Pratap Singh Yadav vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 September, 2021
Judges
  • Rajiv Gupta
Advocates
  • Jitendra Singh Ratish Kumar Singh