Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Virat Pandey vs Smt Meena Srivastava

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 59
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1046 of 2018 Applicant :- Virat Pandey Opposite Party :- Smt. Meena Srivastava, Secretary Counsel for Applicant :- Bansh Raj Mishra
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
A writ petition preferred by him for being granted the copies of his answer script was disposed of with the observation that it would be open to him to move the competent authority under the Right to Information Act, 2005 for provision of the said copies. It was further provided that in case an application to this effect is filed, the same shall be duly attended to and disposed of. Undisputedly, no time frame was stipulated by the High Court for the disposal of the application. Even otherwise if it be the case of the applicant that an application under the 2005 Act has not been disposed of by the P.I.O., he has an adequate remedy of preferring a statutory appeal under the provisions of the said enactment.
Subject to liberty being reserved to initiate such proceedings under the provisions of the 2005 Act, this petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 27.2.2018 Arun K. Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Virat Pandey vs Smt Meena Srivastava

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2018
Judges
  • Yashwant Varma
Advocates
  • Bansh Raj Mishra