Vipulbhai vs Decd

The endorsement on the Board indicates that Notice could not be served upon respondent No.2 as the said respondent is stated to have expired. Mr.Harshadray A.Dave, learned advocate for the petitioners, submits that some time may be granted in order to take steps.

List on 28.02.2012.

Mr.Mitesh L.Rangras, learned advocate for respondents Nos.3 to 10, states that the endorsement on the Board insofar as it shows respondent No.10 to have expired is not correct as he is representing respondent No.10 and the said respondent has not expired.

(Smt.

Abhilasha Kumari, J.) (sunil) Top