Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Vipin vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 53
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4374 of 2018 Applicant :- Vipin Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Srivastava,J.
Mrs. Vatsala, Advocate appeared on behalf of first informant and filed her power, which is taken on record.
Pursuant to order dated 6.2.2018 of this court applicant Vipin duly identified by his counsel has been produced in the Court today by S.I. Dinesh Yadav and first informant Lata Devi brought by S.I. Mahesh Singh, P.S. Bahedi, District Bareilly duly identified by her counsel Mrs. Vatsala is also present in person in the Court.
The applicant stated that he has solemnized marriage with the first informant and is ready to keep her as wife with her full dignity. First informant is also ready to go with the applicant.
In view of the fact that applicant is the husband of the first informant and he is ready to keep the first informant with him as his wife with dignity and first informant is also ready to go with him, I deem proper to enlarge the applicant on bail.
Accordingly, bail application is allowed.
Let applicant- Vipin be released on bail in Case Crime No. 386 of 2017, under Sections 376(2)(N), 504, IPC & Section 6 POCSO Act, P.S.-Bahedi, District Bareilly, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
(i) The applicant will co-operate with the trial and remain present personally on each and every date fixed for framing of charge, recording of evidence as well as recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. or through counsel on other dates and in case of absence without sufficient cause, it will be deemed that he is abusing the liberty of bail enabling the court concerned to take necessary action in accordance with the provisions of Section 82 Cr.P.C. or Sections 174A and 229A I.P.C.
(ii) The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.
(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
Order Date :- 27.2.2018 T. Sinha
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vipin vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2018
Judges
  • Umesh Chandra Srivastava
Advocates
  • Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar