Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Vinubhai vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|23 February, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Shri B.S. Patel, learned advocate for the applicants has submitted that through oversight and by mistake the direct service of notice of Rule to be served upon respondent no.2 is not taken. He has stated at the bar that if respondent no.2 and her husband is here, the applicants may try to settle the matter amicably. Under the circumstances, Registry is directed to issue fresh notice of Rule upon respondent no.2 making it returnable on 2nd March 2012. In the notice, it may also be mentioned that the applicants have already deposited a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards the cost to be paid to respondent no.2, which she can withdraw, if, she appear in the matter. Direct service is permitted.
(M.R.SHAH,J.) kaushik Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vinubhai vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
23 February, 2012