Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Vinod Kumar vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|08 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 38
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8877 of 2021 Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Upendra Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant- Vinod Kumar, seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 106 of 2020, under Section - 3/7 Essential Commodities Act, Police Station - Awagarh, District - Etah during pendency of trial.
3. In view of the direct facts allegations having been made in the FIR constituting offence as disclosed, at present, it is difficult to exercise discretion for grant of anticipatory bail in favour of the applicant.
4. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is rejected, leaving it open to the applicant to apply for regular bail, which application when filed may be considered on its own merit as expeditiously as possible, without being prejudiced by any observation made in this order.
Order Date :- 8.4.2021 A.Kr.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vinod Kumar vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
08 April, 2021
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • Upendra Upadhyay