Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Vinod Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 215 of 2019 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Sunder,Prakash Chandra Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Shri Shyam Sunder, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Shri B.P. Singh Kachhawah, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press this petition.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 pks
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vinod Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2019
Judges
  • Bharati Sapru
Advocates
  • Shyam Sunder Prakash Chandra Pathak

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.