Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Vinod Kumar vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 64
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 36417 of 2019 Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shiv Ram Dubey,Uma Nath Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of impugned order dated 02.03.2007 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Court No.13, Basti whereby non bailable warrant has been issued against the applicant in Case No. 1001 of 2006 (State Vs. Vinod Kumar and Others), arising out of Case Crime No. 8 of 2003, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 120-B I.P.C., Police Station Sonha, District Basti, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate-II, Basti.
Heard applicant's counsel as well as learned AGA and perused the record.
The Court does not see any illegality, impropriety and incorrectness in the impugned order under challenge and also there seem to be no abuse of court's process. There is no good ground to interfere in the same, therefore, the prayer for quashing of the impugned order is refused.
Applicant's counsel submits that as it is being desired by the accused to obtain bail after surrendering in the court below, a protective direction may be issued to the lower court to decide the proposed bail application.
In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in case after surrendering in the court below an application for bail is moved on behalf of the accused within ten days from today, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
In the aforesaid period or till the date of appearance of the accused in the court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive measures shall be taken or given effect to.
It is made clear that if this order is not availed by the accused within stipulated period of time, no time extension application shall be entertained.
It is further clarified that the present order has been passed only with regard to the accused on behalf of whom this application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been moved in this Court.
With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed off.
Order Date :- 30.9.2019 P.S.Parihar
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vinod Kumar vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 September, 2019
Judges
  • Karuna Nand Bajpayee
Advocates
  • Shiv Ram Dubey Uma Nath Pandey