Court No. - 34
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 475 of 2004 Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Tiwari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- R.U. Ansari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate, P.K.Rai, V.K.Rai
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Heard Sri R.U. Ansari, Advocate for applicant and learned A.G.A. as well as Sri P.K. Rai, Advocate for respondents.
2. This is a thoroughly misconceived and ill-advised application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Applicant is challenging order dated 08.01.2004 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kushi Nagar at Padrauna partly allowing Criminal Revision No. Nil of 2003 by passing following order:
^^fjohtu lEcU/kh ;kfpdk vkaf'kd :i ls Lohd`r dh tkrh gSA iz'uxr VS~DVj batu ua0&,l&182 6299 psfpl ua0&189793 dzsrk }kjk fookfnr /kujkf'k vadu :0 67000@& U;k;ky; dks"k eas tek djus dh n'kk eas V~SDVj batu o psfpl ua0 mijksDr dzsrk Jh vfuy dqekj flaUgk foi{kh la0&2 ds i{k esa voeqDr fd;k tk;A U;k;ky; dks"k eas /kujkf'k tek gksus dh n'kk eas fjohtudrkZ QeZ vko';d fodz; i= fu"ikfnr djsxh ftlls dzsrk foi{kh la0&2 ds uke ls jftLV~s'ku laHko gks ldsA dzsrk 60 fnu ds vUnj fnokuh U;k;ky; ds le{k ,dkmf.Vax lEcU/kh okn ;fn izLrqr djrk gS rks fodzsrk QeZ nhokuh U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ds v/khu fookfnr /kujkf'k vadu :0 67000@& ;k mldk dksbZ Hkh Hkkx fudky ldsxhA ;fn 60 fnu ds vUnj dzsrk }kjk dksbZ okn nhokuh U;k;ky; ds le{k ,dkmf.Max ds lEcU/k esa okn ugha izLrqr fd;k tkrk rks fodzsrk QeZ lEcfU/kr /kujkf'k U;k;ky; ds le{k izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djds izkIr dj ldsxhA fjohtu ;kfpdk rn~uqlkj fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA** “Revision Petition is partially allowed. In case of an amount to the tune of Rs 67000/- being deposited by the purchaser of the disputed tractor having engine no S-182 6299, chasis no 189793, the aforesaid tractor having engine and chasis number be released in the favour of respondent no 2 Sri Anil Kumar Sinha. In case of the amount being deposited in court treasury, the revisionist firm shall execute a necessary sale deed which will facilitate registration in the name of respondent no 3, the purchaser. If the purchaser files an accounting related suit in the civil court within 60 days, the seller firm can withdraw the disputed amount to the tune of Rs 67,000/- or any part thereof, subject to the order of the civil court. If the purchaser does not file any suit related to accounting before the civil court within 60 days, the seller firm can get back the concerned amount by presenting an application before the court. Revision Petition stands disposed accordingly.”(English translation by Court)
3. Learned counsel for applicant submitted that Rs. 67,000/- has not been deposited but I do not find as to how aforesaid fact will be a ground for quashing of order dated 08.01.2004, which is the relief sought in present application.
4. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.11.2019 AK