Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38335 of 2019 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Prajapati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Sawhney Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard Sri Rajeev Sawhney, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State- respondents.
By means of this writ petition the petitioner wants a direction to decide his representation.
However, a perusal of the writ petition reveals that the prayer of the petitioner is that appropriate action to be taken against respondent no.3 who is stated to be illegally running a wine shop on the National Highway.
The petitioner in the writ petition has not made out any case so as to establish that the aforesaid wine shop is being run in an illegal manner.
In view of the above, it is not a fit case for exercising out discretionary jurisdiction in the matter.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 28.11.2019 Shahroz