Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Vinay Kumar Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7482 of 2018 Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Prakash Srivastava,Sugendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shyam Krishna Gupta
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
1. Heard Sri Anand Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State of U.P. and Sri Shyam Krishna Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no. 4.
2. It is stated that National Commission for Schedule Caste has made some enquiry from District Magistrate. His response to the same is still awaited.
3. That being so, it is for the National Commission to look into the matter. No mandamus can be issued to District Magistrate to enquire into caste certificate issued by Teshildar.
4. Writ petition is wholly misconceived. Dismissed.
Order Date :- 28.2.2018 A. Verma
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vinay Kumar Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 February, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Anand Prakash Srivastava Sugendra Kumar Yadav