Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Vimalamma Wife Of Late

High Court Of Karnataka|08 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 581 OF 2018 (RES) BETWEEN:
1. CHANDRAMMA WIFE OF LATE LAL BAHADUR, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS.
2. SMT. KASATURI DAUGHTER OF LATE LAL BAHADUR, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS.
3. SMT. SRI SHANKAR SON OF LATE LAL BAHADUR, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS.
4. SMT. ANJALA DAUGHTER OF LATE LAL BAHADUR, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT NEAR HOLY CROSS CHURCH, KATHIHALLI, MARUTHI NAGAR, BEML NAGAR POST, BANGARPET TALUK.
... APPELLANTS (BY SRI.PRASHANTH P.N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1. SMT VIMALAMMA WIFE OF LATE K. ANJANEYAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS HINDU, MAJOR.
2. SRI. LOKESH SON OF LATE K. ANJANEYAMURTHY, HINDU, MAJOR.
3. SMT. SHILPA DAUGHTER OF LATE K. ANJANEYAMURTHY, HINDU, MAJOR.
4. SMT. KAVYA DAUGHTER OF LATE K. ANJANEYAMURTHY, HINDU, MAJOR RESIDENT OF AMARAVATHI LAYOUT, BANGARPET TOWN AND TALUK.
5. SMT. KANCHANA DAUGHTER OF LATE LAL BAHADDUR AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS.
6. LAKSHMI DAUGHTER OF LATE LAL BAHADDUR AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS.
BOTH ARE RESIDING NEAR HOLY CROSS CHURCH, KATHIHALLI, MARUTHI NAGAR BEML NAGAR POST BANGARPET TALUK.
... RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.11.2017 PASSED IN RA. NO. 102/2016, ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND PRL.JMFC., K.G.F., DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.07.2016 PASSED IN OS NO. 279/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., BANGARPET.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellants. This Court on 24.09.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this preemptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
SD/- JUDGE nv Ct:sr
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Vimalamma Wife Of Late

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
08 November, 2019
Judges
  • B M Shyam Prasad