Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3167 of 2019 Petitioner :- Vimal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel accepted notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2.
In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the respondent No.3.
The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition with the prayer to issue a mandamus directing the respondent No.2/Settlement Officer of Consolation, Mau to decide Appeal No.509 of 2004 (Vimal Versus Ram Chandera and others) Under Section 11(1) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953.
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter is pending since 2004 but till date no decision has been final taken and prays for expeditious disposal Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by petitioner.
Heard learned counsel for the parties present. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties present, the present writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the respondent No.respondent No.2/Settlement Officer of Consolation, Mau to consider and decide the aforesaid appeal in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order but certainly after giving opportunity to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.
Order Date :- 20.12.2019 saqlain