Court No. - 60
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18490 of 2018 Applicant :- Vimal Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of Up And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Babu Lal Ram,Arjun Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ravindra Nath Kakkar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
The present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing further proceedings of Case No.4072 of 2018 (State Vs. Vimal Kumar), in Case Crime No.164 of 2017, under Sections 353, 186, 427 I.P.C., pending in the court below; further for quashing the cognizance order dated 27.03.2018; further for quashing the further proceeding of charge sheet dated 20.09.2017 submitted in Case Crime No.164 of 2017, under Sections 353, 186, 427 I.P.C., Police Station Chandpur, District Fatehpur.
The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that no offence against the applicant is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention.
From a perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicant. All the submission made at the bar relates to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage.
The prayer for quashing the impugned orders is refused.
However, it is provided that if the applicant appears and surrenders before the court below within 45 days from today and applies for bail, his prayer for bail may be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. For a period of 45 days from today or till the disposal of the application for grant of bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. However, in case, the applicant does not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against him.
With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed off.
Order Date :- 31.5.2018 Anand Sri./-