Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Vikram Pratap Singh vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 35
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 499 of 2021 Revisionist :- Vikram Pratap Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Sandeep Kumar Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
Misc. Time Extension Application No. 2 of 2021
1. Sri Sandeep Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he could not comply with the order dated 13.7.2021 due to ill health of his daughter.
2. In view of such facts, he is granted three working days time to deposit the postal fee and remove the defects as pointed by the Registry.
3. Extension application is allowed accordingly.
Order Date :- 30.9.2021 S.K.S.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vikram Pratap Singh vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 September, 2021
Judges
  • Vivek Agarwal
Advocates
  • Sandeep Kumar Pathak

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.