Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34871 of 2021 Applicant :- Vikas Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ankur Jee Srivastav,Lalit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the material available on record.
This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No.70 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 324 and 307 IPC, Police Station Nevadhiya, District Jaunpur.
As per allegation made in the impugned FIR, Akash, Vikash, Tiger and Chandra Bhushan armed with Lathi Danda, knife and Axe have assaulted the victim.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. The incident took place on 17.05.2021 whereas the impugned FIR has been lodged on 18.05.2021 without there being any explanation regarding delay. There are four accused persons named in the impugned FIR. The injured Chandan Kumar in his statement has levelled only general allegations against all the accused persons including the applicant. The applicant has been assigned the role of causing injury by Axe, but as per injury report, there is no injury of Axe. He further submits that the applicant has never committed any offence as alleged in the first information report. There is no independent eye witness of the alleged incident. He further submits that in the alleged incident, the applicant has also received injuries, but his FIR has not been lodged, hence, applicant has moved an application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., which is still pending. He further submits that applicant is having no criminal history and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The applicant is in jail since 19.05.2021.
On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposes the application for bail.
After perusing the record in the light of the submissions made at the bar and after taking an overall view of all the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of evidence, the period of detention already undergone, the unlikelihood of early conclusion of trial and also the absence of any convincing material to indicate the possibility of tampering with the evidence, this Court is of the view that the applicant may be enlarged on bail.
Let the applicant-Vikas, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A IPC.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A IPC.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
(v) The Trial Court may make all possible efforts/endeavour and try to conclude the trial within a period of one year after the release of the applicant.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses.
Order Date :- 20.12.2021/Ajeet