Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 48989 of 2018 Applicant :- Vikas @ Karu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pravin Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Virendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
This bail application has been filed by Vikas @ Karu for bail in Case Crime No. 566 of 2018, under Sections 392 I.P.C., Police Station Mohammadabad, District Farrukhabad.
Heard Sri Pravin Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. Recovery shown from his possession was false. He is not named in the First Information Report. No identification parade was conducted by the police. Recovery shown from his possession was different than the looted property mentioned in F.I.R. The offence is very simple in nature. He is in jail since 16.10.2018. The applicant has no other reported criminal antecedent. If he be released on bail, he will never misuse his liberty and will co-operate in the trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.
Looking into the facts and circumstances of the case as well as nature and gravity of the offence and recovery made from the applicant's possession, material available on record regarding the role of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that the bail application is liable to be allowed. Hence, this bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant-Vikas @ Karu involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties (one should be of his family members/nearest relatives) each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses.
(iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel.
(v) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and (iv) argument/judgement.
If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 20.12.2018 Saurabh