Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Vijayalakshmi

High Court Of Karnataka|02 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.59345/2013 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, W/O LATE M.S.PRITHWIRAJ 2. MR.P.GURU PRASAD, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O LATE M.S.PRITHWIRAJ, DEFE – 5 & 6 ARE RESIDING AT NO.41, “HONGE LAKSHMI”, 1ST FLOOR, 10TH MAIN, 30TH CROSS, JAYANAGAR 6TH BLOCK, BENGALOORU-560041.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. RAJANNA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. JAGADISH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O MUNIANJANI 2. DHANALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, D/O MUNIANJANI BOTH ARE REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MRS.JAYALAKSHMI.
3. MRS. VIMALA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, D/O MUNIANJANI, 4. MRS.JAYALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O MUNIRANJANI.
RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT NO.82, DOOPANAHALLI VILLAGE, INDIRANAGAR II STAGE, BANGALORE-560 038 5. SRI.MUNIANJANI MAJOR, S/O CHIKLAKSHMAIAH, C/O K.P.BALAPPA BLDGS, 2, DOOPANAHALLI VILLAGE, INDIRANAGAR II STAGE, BANGALORE-560038.
6. MR.SRIRAAMULU MAJOR, S/O PULLIYAPPA, DOOPANAHALLI VILLAGE, INDIRANAGAR II STAGE, BANGALORE-56OO38 7. MR.V.NAGARAJ MAJOR, S/O LATE VENKATANARANAPPA, 33, DOOPANAHALLI VILLAGE, INDIRANAGAR II STAGE, BANGALORE-560 038.
8. MR.KRISHNAREDDY AGEDA BOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE PAPAIAH, #630, 6TH CROSS, 7TH MAIN, HAL 3RD STAGE, BENGALOORU-75.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. LAKSHMI, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 TO R-4;
NOTICE TO R-5 TO R-8 DISPENSED WITH V/O/D 31.12.13) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ORDER DT. 05.11.2013 PASSED BY THE XLIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE ON IA NO.39 IN OS NO.1563/89 PRODUCED AT ANN-D, AS ILLEGAL & QUASH THE SAME.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that prayer in the present writ petition has become infructuous, since the suit in question has been dismissed on merits.
Memo is filed to the said effect and same is placed on record. In view of the same, petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
SD/- JUDGE DR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Vijayalakshmi

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
02 January, 2019
Judges
  • Aravind Kumar