Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Vijaya Electricals A Proprietor Firm vs M/S Lanarsy Infra Limited A Company

High Court Of Karnataka|27 March, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.255 OF 2015 BETWEEN:
M/S.VIJAYA ELECTRICALS A PROPRIETOR FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.110 4TH MAIN, E.W.S. LAY-OUT B.S.K. III STAGE, BANGALORE-560 085 REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR BY NAME SRI K.R. MANJU S/O.LATE RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS ... PETITIONER (BY SRI MADHUSUDHAN M.N., ADV.) AND:
M/S. LANARSY INFRA LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.6, 4TH CROSS MARUTHI NAGARA CHANDRA LAY-OUT, BANGALORE-560 040 REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY/DIRECTOR B.PADMAJA. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI G. MANIVANNAN, ADV.) THIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(5) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING TO APPOINT SRI N.S.SANGOLLI, RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE, NO.415/2, F BLOCK, NEAR POST OFFICE, SAHAKARNAGAR, BANGALORE-92 AS THE SOLE ARBITRATOR WHOSE NAME HAS ALREADY BEEN SUGGESTED BY THE PETITIONER OR ALTERNATIVELY PLEASED TO APPOINT ANY OTHER PERSON/S AS A SOLE ARBITRATOR OR ARBITRATORS FOR ADJUDICATION OF DISPUTES BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ARBITRATOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO AND ALLOW THIS PETITION BY AWARDING COST AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT TO GRANT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Sri Madhusudhan M.N., learned counsel for petitioner.
Sri G. Manivannan, learned counsel for respondent.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter to some extent seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to serve a notice on the respondent in terms of Clause-28 of the agreement dated 02.08.2013 executed between the parties and thereafter approach this Court, if need be.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/- JUDGE ST
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Vijaya Electricals A Proprietor Firm vs M/S Lanarsy Infra Limited A Company

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
27 March, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe Civil