Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Vijay Pratap Singh vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38001 of 2019 Applicant :- Vijay Pratap Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Indra Kumar Singh,Beerendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant states that during investigation, injured did not support the prosecution version and has also filed affidavit on account of which closure / final report has been submitted, thus, the present application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 26.9.2019 Dhirendra/
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vijay Pratap Singh vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 September, 2019
Judges
  • Rajul Bhargava
Advocates
  • Indra Kumar Singh Beerendra Pratap Singh

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.