Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Vijay Pratap Ram vs State Of U P & Ors

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 21133 of 2013 Petitioner :- Vijay Pratap Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
1. Notice was issued to petitioner to engage another counsel vide Court's order dated 08.05.2018 and it was sent by registered post on 11.05.2018. Perused the office report dated 30.05.2018. Service is deemed sufficient. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioner.
2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:
“(a) Issue a writ, order of direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the undated charge sheet (Annexure 1 to the writ petition).
(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to discontinue and drop the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner, in pursuance of the charge sheet (Annexure 1 to the writ petition).
(e) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the enquiry report dated 25.03.2013 (Annxure 11 of the affidavit).
(f) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the letter dated 1.4.2013 (Annexure 12 of the affidavit).
(g) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to not to take any further action in pursuance of the enquiry report dated 25.03.2013 and letter dated 1.4.2013.”
3. However, we ourselves have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or that petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 31.5.2018 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vijay Pratap Ram vs State Of U P & Ors

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2018