Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Vijay Kumar Yadav vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|10 May, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 52
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16899 of 2021 Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Prakash Chandra Srivastava
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State as well as Sri Prakash Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the informant through video conferencing and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has not committed the present offence. It is further submitted that co-accused Abhishek Rai has been granted bail by this Court on 15.3.2021 vide Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.11340 of 2021. He further submits that only role of exhortation has been assigned to the applicant. Since the role of the applicant is not distinguishable with the role of co-accused, the applicant is also entitled for bail. It is further submitted that applicant is languishing in jail since 11.2.2021 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, the fact that the identically placed co-accused has already been released on bail by this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that it is a fit case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Vijay Kumar Yadav involved in Case Crime No.297 of 2020, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302/34, 504, 404, 506 IPC and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act,, Police Station Devgaon, District Azamgarh be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions,the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.
The party shall file self-attested computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad. The concerned Court / Authority / Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 10.5.2021 ss Digitally signed by Justice Om Prakash Date: 2021.05.11 14:20:48 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vijay Kumar Yadav vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
10 May, 2021
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Sanjay Kumar Yadav