Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Vijay Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 10
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36092 of 2018 Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bashisth Narain Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dharam Deo Chauhan
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to private respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer for a direction to second respondent to decide the application of the petitioner dated 4.9.2018 within stipulated period.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue and with the consent, the writ petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the second respondent to consider and decide the aforesaid application in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order but certainly after giving opportunity to the parties concerned.
Order Date :- 30.10.2018 SP/
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vijay Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 October, 2018
Judges
  • Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Advocates
  • Bashisth Narain Pandey