Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Vijay Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22123 of 2019 Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Subhash Chand Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
Heard Sri Subhash Chand learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A. K. Sand learned A.G.A.
This writ petition has been filed, seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent concerned, not to arrest the petitioner, with a further prayer for quashing the impugned FIR dated 22.3.2019 in Case Crime No. 92 of 2019, under Sections 147, 149, 323, 326, 452, 506, 308, 325 IPC, P.S. Sasani, District Hathras.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR has been lodged on false/vexatious/mischievous allegations, no offences are made out, FIR be quashed.
Learned AGA has opposed the submission.
The correctness of the allegations would have to be tested on the basis of the materials collected during the course of investigation as by insertion of Notification No.1058/79-V-1-19-1 (Ka)-20-2018 dated 6th June 2019, an alternate remedy is available to the petitioner to seek for an anticipatory bail. We deem it appropriate to dismiss this petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to apply for anticipatory bail.
The writ petition is dismissed.
It is made clear that we have not adjudicated the contentions raised which are left open for the petitioner to raise at an appropriate stage in an appropriate proceeding, in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 30.9.2019 AS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vijay Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 September, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Subhash Chand