Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Vijay Kumar Srivastava And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8998 of 2018 Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Srivastava And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganesh Shanker Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has confined his prayer for a direction to to first respondent to decide his representation dated 22.08.2014 for payment of salary within stipulated period.
Considering the facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue and with the consent, the writ petition stands disposed of with observation that in case the petitioners file fresh representation ventilating their grievances before the first respondent within fifteen days, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Order Date :- 30.3.2018 SP/
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vijay Kumar Srivastava And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 March, 2018
Judges
  • Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Advocates
  • Ganesh Shanker Srivastava