Court No. - 49
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4517 of 2018 Revisionist :- Vijay Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Revisionist :- Maya Pati Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and the learned A.G.A.
This revision is filed by the revisionist for setting aside the impugned Judgment/order dated 25-10-2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bansi, Siddharth Nagar, in Sessions Trial No. 154 of 2016, State Versus Krishna Kumar and Others, arising out of N.C.R. No. 83 of 2015, under sections 323/34,504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Bansi, District-Siddharth Nagar.
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for revisionist submits that grievance of revisionist would be sufficiently met in case bail application of revisionist is considered expeditiously in accordance with law.
In view thereof, it is provided that if the revisionist surrenders before the Court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail, the Court below will consider the same, in accordance with law in view of the observations made in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in [2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC)].
For a period of three weeks, no coercive steps shall be taken against the revisionist.
With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 20.12.2018 AKS (Vivek Chaudhary,J.)