IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.P.NO.3008/2019(GM-RES) BETWEEN:
VIHAAN DIRECT SELLING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., LEVEL 7, MFAR GREENHEART MANYATA TECH PARK OUTER RING ROAD, HEBBAL BANGALORE – 560 045, KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, MR. BANU RAMDAS.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.R. KRISHNAMURTHY., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER, K.J. HALLI POLICE STATION BANGALORE – 560 043.
2. STATE OF TELANGANA REPRESENTED BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MIYAPUR POLICE STATION, CYBERABAD COMMISSIONERATE HYDERABAD – 500 081.
... RESPONDENTS (R-1 AND R-2 ARE SERVED THROUGH HAND SUMMONS) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACTION OF THE R-2 IN SEALING AND ATTACHING THE PETITIONERS WAREHOUSE [GO-DOWN] AS ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL, AND WITHOUT AUTHORITY OF LAW AND CONSEQUENTLY BE SET ASIDE AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO REMOVE THE LOCK AND SEAL OF THE PREMISES FORTHWITH AND RETURN THE CUSTODY OF THE PREMISES TO THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned Advocate appearing for petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw this petition and has sought for refund of costs deposited by petitioner before this Court. Said memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of withdrawal of writ petition, costs deposited by petitioner is ordered to be refunded to the authorised representative of petitioner on proper identification and Registry is directed to issue the cheque forthwith.
SD/- JUDGE *sp