(On C.M. Application No. 110796 of 2010) Heard learned counsel for the applicants/review petitioners and perused the record. This application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, supported with an affidavit, has been moved on behalf of the review petitioners for condonation of delay in filing the review petition on the grounds enumerated in the affidavit. Grounds seem to be sufficient.
Application is allowed and the delay in filing the review petition is condoned. Order Date :- 20.11.2010 kkm .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Court No. - 19 Case :- REVIEW PETITION DEFECTIVE No. - 433 of 2010 Petitioner :- Vidya Sagar & Ors. ( M/S 4131/2010 ) Respondent :- U.P. Board Of Revenue, U.P.,Lucknow Thru Chairman & Anr. Petitioner Counsel :- N.U. Khan Hon'ble S.C. Chaurasia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the review petitioners and perused the record. This review petition has been filed with the prayer that the judgment and order dated 27.07.2010 passed by this Court may be set aside. In the review petition, de novo hearing is not permissible. I do not find any error apparent on the face of record in the judgment and order dated 27.07.2010. Hence, there is no sufficient ground to review the said order. The review petition is devoid of merit and it is dismissed accordingly. Order Date :- 20.11.2010 kkm