IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION No. 5245/2018 (GM – FC) BETWEEN:
VIDHYA V.
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS W/O S. KRISHNA PRASAD R/AT NO. 184/A, 4TH CROSS TELECOM LAYOUT SRIRAMPURA, JAKKUR POST BANGALORE-560 024. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. RAMA R. IYER, ADV.) AND:
S. KRISHNAPRASAD AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS S/O K.C. SOMANATHAN R/AT NO. “KRISHNARAPANAM” EXCEL PARK, STP ROAD ELAMKULAM KOCH-682 020. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. BEENA P.K., ADV.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 09.08.2017 ON I.A.NO.2 FILED UNDER SEC.24 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT R/W SEC 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IN MC NO.853/2016 PASSED BY AND ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE, VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Smt.Rama R.Iyer, learned Counsel for petitioner.
Smt.Beena.P.K, learned counsel for the respondent.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally.
2. In this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the validity of the order dated 9.08.2017 by which application filed by the petitioner under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been partly allowed.
3. After arguing the matter to some extent, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, afresh, in view of the subsequent events which have taken place during the pendency of this petition.
In view of the aforesaid submission, writ petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/- JUDGE ln.