Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Vidhya Prasad Yadav And Another vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 4 ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|05 August, 2014

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Dinesh Maheshwari,J.
On the facts, submission as made and the grounds so taken in the memo of writ petition, we are of the view that counter affidavit is required to be filed by the respondents.
Learned Chief Standing Counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no. 1. Issue notice to respondents 2 to 5. Steps will be taken within ten days.
Counter affidavit may be filed by the next date.
List this petition after service.
As an interim measure. it is provided that till the next date of listing no amount will be deducted from the salary of the petitioner.
Order Date :- 5.8.2014 M.A.A.
(Dinesh Maheshwari, J.) ( S.K. Singh, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vidhya Prasad Yadav And Another vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 4 ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
05 August, 2014
Judges
  • Sheo Kumar Singh
  • Dinesh Maheshwari