Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Venkubai And Others vs Kuppuswamy And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|09 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.335 OF 2015 (EX) BETWEEN:
SMT.VENKUBAI, SINCE DECEASED BY LR M.V.SUNDAR RAJ.
SINCE DECEASED BY LRs 1. SMT.PUSPHA, AGED 58 YEARS, W/O LATE M.V.SUNDARARAJ.
2. SRI.B.S.MANIKANTH, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O LATE M.V.SUNDARARAJ.
BOTH 1 AND 2 R/AT NO.16/3-8, MOUNT JOY ROAD, HANUMANTHANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 019.
AMENDED AS PER ORDER DATED 09.06.2016. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI.ANANTHA NARAYANA B.N, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. KUPPUSWAMY, SINCE DECEASED BY LR, SMT.RAJESWARI, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O NO.6, 1ST FLOOR, 1ST MAIN, T.R.NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560028.
2. GURUDATT, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, S/O LATE B.VENKATA RAO, NO.14, MODEL HOUSE STREET, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU – 560004.
3. SHANKARANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O LATE B.VENKATA RAO, R/O NO.15, MOUNT JOY ROAD, HANUMANTHANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560019.
4. M.V.GOWRISHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE B.VENKATA RAO, R/O NO.40, 2ND CROSS, MUNESHWARA TEMPLE STREET, OPP.KODIGENAHALLI, PETROL BUNK, BENGALURU – 560061. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1, V/O/D 06.10.2015 NOTICE TO R2 TO R4) THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 07.03.2015 PASSED ON IA IN EX.NO.2248/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE XIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, ALLOWING THE IA FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF CPC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated submitting that this revision petition filed challenging the order dated 07.03.2015 passed on I.A. filed by the decree holder under Section 151 CPC in the Execution Petition No.2248/2000. The said Execution Petition was disposed of on 28.03.2018. Therefore, the present petition does not survive for consideration.
2. Considering the submission of the counsel, memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed as the same has become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE BSR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Venkubai And Others vs Kuppuswamy And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
09 April, 2019
Judges
  • Ashok G Nijagannavar Civil