IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.07.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.19212 of 2017 Venkatesh ...Petitioner v.
1. The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri District
2. The Sub Collector Hosur Krishnagiri District
3. The Tahsildar Hosur Taluk Office Hosur Krishnagiri District
4. The Revenue Inspector Bagalur Hosur Taluk Krishnagiri District ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.09.2016 for rectification of errors crept in, in the Revenue records including Village 'A' Register relating to land to an extent of 0.33.5 Hectare in Survey No.65/4 situate at Choodagondapalli village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District, within the time to be stipulated by this court.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Bharath Kumar For Respondent : Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy Government Advocate O R D E R Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider his representation dated 12.09.2016 for rectification of errors crept in the Revenue records including Village 'A' Register relating to land, measuring an extent of 0.33.5 Hectare in Survey No.65/4 situated at Choodagondapalli village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District, within the time frame.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the petitioner's representation dated 12.09.2016, for rectification of the errors that crept in the revenue records, the 2nd respondent has not rectified the same yet.
4. Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents submitted that the 2nd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.09.2016, and pass orders, in accordance with law, within a time frame.
5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.09.2016, and pass orders, in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties, within a period of six weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Index: Yes/No Rj 27.07.2017 To
1. The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri District
2. The Sub Collector Hosur Krishnagiri District
3. The Tahsildar Hosur Taluk Office Hosur Krishnagiri District
4. The Revenue Inspector Bagalur Hosur Taluk Krishnagiri District M.DURAISWAMY,J.
Rj W.P.No.19212 of 2017 27.07.2017