Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Veerpal And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34091 of 2019 Applicant :- Veerpal And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard Sri Pankaj Kumar Tripathi and Sri Garun Pal Singh, learned counsels for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants, Veerpal and Ravi with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No. 146 of 2019, under Sections 452, 323, 307, 325, 504 IPC, Police Station Highway, District- Mathura, during pendency of trial.
Submission is that four persons have been assigned general role. No specific role has been assigned to the applicants. Co-accused, who was assigned the role of firing, has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 29.5.2019 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15852 of 2019. However, regarding the applicants, it has been submitted that they were not assigned any role of firing, but they have been assigned the role of causing injury with Lathi and Danda, wherein one fracture of elbow was found to have been caused to Inder Singh. The other injureds also suffered injuries, but there is no fracture found on their body. The applicants do not have any criminal history to their credit. They are languishing in jail since 26.7.2019. In case, the applicants are released on bail, tehy will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicants by contending that the innocence of the applicants cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, they do not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicants are released on bail they will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.
Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of
Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicants involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicants shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicants shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicants and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 22.8.2019 Ruchi Agrahari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Veerpal And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 August, 2019
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Pankaj Kumar Tripathi