Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Veermati vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46025 of 2021 Applicant :- Veermati Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mohd. Aslam,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has been further argued that co-accused Gokaran @ Kalla and Evaz have been released on bail vide order of this Court dated 30.11.2021. It has been further argued that the applicant is languishing in jail since 14.03.2021 and that, in case, she is released on bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of evidence and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicants has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Veermati involved in Case Crime No.31 of 2021, under Sections 457, 380, 411 and 120-B I.P.C., Police Station-Kolhui, District- Maharajganj, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which she is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which she is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail in accordance with law.
The party may file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by pairokar of the applicant.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 21.12.2021 Jyotsana
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Veermati vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2021
Judges
  • Mohd Aslam
Advocates
  • Jitendra Kumar Yadav