Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Veer Singh vs State Of U P & Ors

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 30287 of 2003 Petitioner :- Veer Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioner.
2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:
“a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to pay the salary to the petitioner as per Government Order dated 19.9.1994 (Annexure-II to the writ petition).
b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner which is pending before him since long back.”
3. However, I have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or that petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 24.8.2018 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Veer Singh vs State Of U P & Ors

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 August, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Anil Kumar