1. In present petition, the petitioner has prayed for below mentioned relief:
"(B) Be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 3.3.2012 along with inter-district transfer order issued by the resp. no.3 district education committee, Junagadh, at Ann. Coll. in the interest of justice."
2. When the impugned order dated 03/03/2012 is examined, it emerges from the record that by the impugned order, the service of the petitioner is actually terminated on the ground that he obtained service by improper and illegal means.
3. Thus, by the said order dated 03/03/2012 the service of the petitioner is terminated.
4. However, the petitioner has in the relief/prayer clause mentioned that he is challenging the order dated 03/03/2012 "which is of inter district transfer".
5. To say the least, about the conflict between the relief prayed for (which gives an impression that order under challenge is about inter district transfer) in the petition and the actual effect and purport of the impugned order suffice to say that in view of the conflict between the relief/prayer clause and the order impugned in present petition, the petition is not entertained.
6. At this stage, learned advocate for the petitioner has requested for permission to withdraw the petition with a view to filing fresh petition challenging only the order terminating his service. The request, as prayed for, is granted. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with a view to enable the petitioner to file fresh petition challenging his termination of service.
(K.M.THAKER, J.) (ila) Top