Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ved Prakash vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 50
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 7596 of 2018 Appellant :- Ved Prakash Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Jitendra Pal Singh,Pradeep Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
This criminal appeal under Section 14-A (2) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been preferred by the appellant with the prayer to allow this appeal and set-aside the impugned cognizance order dated 12.11.2018 passed by II Addl. District & Sessions Judge / Special Judge, S.C./S.T. Act, Pilibhit as well as charge sheet dated 5.8.2018 in S.S.T. No.294 of 2018 arising out of case crime no.282 of 2018 under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and 3 (1) (da) S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station Sungarhi, District Pilibhit.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the entire record.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that cognizance taken in the matter is bad in the eye of law. Charge sheet has illegally been submitted against the appellant. Court below did not apply judicial mind while taking cognizance in the matter. It is a no injury case. Appellant is innocent and has not committed any offence. Allegations made against him are false. Referring to the entire evidence collected during investigation by the investigating officer, it is further submitted that no prima facie case is made out against the appellant.
On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State argued that a prima facie case is made out against the appellant. Cognizance taken in the matter is not illegal. There is sufficient evidence collected by the investigating officer to proceed with trial. There is no infirmity or illegality in the cognizance order. Hence, appeal is liable to be dismissed.
I have considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the entire record including the impugned order carefully.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing the parties and going through the entire record including the impugned order carefully, no illegality or infirmity is found in the impugned order. The Court dealing with the matter, at this stage, has to see only a prima facie case and from the perusal of the entire record available on record it cannot be said that no prima facie case is made out.
Thus, appeal is devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed.
However, appellant is directed to surrender before the court below within a period of 45 days from today. For a period of 45 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the appellant.
It is made clear that no further time shall be allowed to the appellant to surrender before the Court below.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018
ss
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ved Prakash vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2018
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Jitendra Pal Singh Pradeep Kumar Singh